RegisT
My feedback
4 results found
-
677 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment RegisT
supported this idea
·
-
1,854 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
RegisT
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment RegisT
commented
Désactivation d'une fonctionnalité de source de foule qui profite les gens du commun? ça n'a aucun sens.
Les humains utilisent ingéniosité. Une organisation de la planification de telles atrocités ne compter sur leurs propres éclaireurs et réseau de communication.
---
Disabling a crowd source feature that benefits the common folk? makes no sense.Humans use ingenuity. An organization planning such atrocities would rely on their own scouts and network of communication.
An error occurred while saving the comment RegisT
commented
@vince1612 : exactly! .. exactly why there needs to be an option for "moving" in addition to stationary & hidden -Because *some* people will report moving patrols. Without an option to specify this, there is no way to filter or ignore them (at your discretion)
-
3,218 votes
What we are aiming to do here is speed based alerters.
An error occurred while saving the comment RegisT
commented
[it's been ages since i commented on this thread. today, a less than thoughtful comment inspired me to share ^^]
Background: i remember one day when my daughter came home from [public] school frustrated -telling me that she had to debate from the "LESS Gun Control" perspective with which she disagreed (they had been "learning" about the importance of gun control).
----
hmm. i told her to look up actual data on Wikipedia: gun homicides by country.
-----
i needn't bother saying more about what she *really* learned that day..
=============
needless to say, cars don't usually kill -People Do- including those who are risk takers or suicidal..
** more information (police reporting)
** presented with safety in mind (increase the warning distance)**** IS NOT the same as promoting reckless endangerment & speeding..
* does it allow scofflaws to use the information as a warning to warn them to slow down?
Absolutely!--- i don't see a problem ---
(i just hope the idiot speeding behind me doesn't rear-end ME, *when I slow down* :)
RegisT
supported this idea
·
-
1,215 votesRegisT
supported this idea
·
@Sherlock McGyver: you are obviously an intelligent nut..
to bother posting here..
but, you don't get it..
** your personal life-experiences are either too young or sheltered to take seriously