Allow lower rank editors (like me) to close roads from within WME. Since Waze doesn't want to allow low ranked editors to close roads (for good reasons), the solution would be to only show the closed roads for the editor and group. If others value my contribution, they can subscribe to my group and get additional road closure updates.

It might also be possible to close a road and have it marked unapproved, awaiting for a higher rank editor. But that unapproved closure would be active for the user and group within the App.

If the closed road gains enough confidence from other users, or verified by a higher rank, then a higher rank editor can approve the road closure, and be active for all Wazers.

And of course, the low rank editor should get points for trying to improve the commute for other wazers. For reporting a closed road, that should be MAJOR points since it has high impact.

And if that users earns confidence, there should be no reason to wait for a higher rank editor, or wait until that editor earns 25K points.

Why?
My commute experiences seasonal flooding. Within WME I can't close the road at my level, nor am I going to drive to a closed road just to report it. But I need Waze to avoid the road and route me, or if all roads/routes are closed, tell me I can't get to my destination.

The risk and potential abuse of low rank editors is a non-issue by my proposed solution above.

Add to map places where there is flooding possibility. These places should appear on the map as warning if app receive any alert near of 10 km about climate risk or flooding, and if confirmed by user on app, change the routing as already made.
Support: The flodding areas were reported by some regions like Sao Paulo city(http://noticias.uol.com.br/cotidiano/ultimas-noticias/2013/11/22/sao-paulo-tera-sinalizacao-com-aviso-sobre-locais-de-enchentes-neste-verao.htm) and related on reliable sources like GeoSampa.
This update was also reported by other users but with other ideas (https://waze.uservoice.com/search?filter=ideas&query=alagamento).

Adicionar ao mapa locais onde há possibilidade de alagamento. Esses locais devem aparecer no mapa como aviso em caso de alertas próximos 10 km sobre risco climático ou demais alagamentos, e em caso de confirmação pelo app, alterar o roteamento.
Material suporte: As áreas sujeitas a alagamento foram divulgadas por algumas prefeituras a exemplo de São Paulo (http://noticias.uol.com.br/cotidiano/ultimas-noticias/2013/11/22/sao-paulo-tera-sinalizacao-com-aviso-sobre-locais-de-enchentes-neste-verao.htm) e constam em fontes confiáveis como o GeoSampa.
Essa inclusão é relatada também por outros usuários em conjunto com outras idéias (https://waze.uservoice.com/search?filter=ideas&query=alagamento).

We really need the ability to add time dependent Speed Limits for school zones or other times of the day where the maximum speed limit changes, this would not only help with navigation slow downs (which most school zones wouldn't affect too much anyway) but would also increase safety for drivers and pedestrians in the area.

If we were able to set speed limits during specific times of the day it would mean a popup warning for a changed speed would mean users would be aware and slow down and hopefully prevent accidents from occurring in this speed sensitive zones.

Please vote up if you agree, so we can get this added to the Waze map editor!!!

Hello I am William Jamros a 7 day a week waze user (because of work) but I drive a commercial vehicle I just was wondering if in the soon future you could put A commercial vehicle option for roads such a palisades parkway because I get lost or end up on a road that is illegal for me to be on because of the commercial vehicle :( I believe it would also make the common working man get your app as well! Thank you for your time if you could contact me back sometime soon regarding this that would great! Until then I will always continue to use waze thank you for such a great GPS! And if you change it don't forget to name the option after me LOL

It would be nice to have a comment section on a PUR, especially for pictures. It would allow the editors to give a reason why the picture or update is being rejected. So maybe the next time they would try to take a better picture that did not include, faces, license plates, etc. I think this would help the community be more aware of what we as editors can accept. I think being able to tell them the reasons instead of just rejecting it would help more, due to the fact users my be confused or upset that their pictures or updates never get published.

I suggest to refine the designations of Parking Lots to include Customer Parking Only, Employee Parking Only, Faculty/Staff Parking Only, Visitor Parking, Event Parking Only, etc.

With the specified designations, the parking lot suggestion would not show up in the suggested parking lots unless the user had selected the attached destination.

Use cases:

-In an office park there are many parking lots, most of which are for employees only. There are areas designated for visitors, which would be a good thing to indicate on the waze app.

-There is a stadium where parking is for events only, and whenever one goes a venue near there currently one is suggested to park at the stadium, which is not a valid suggestion. Only suggest when one is going to the stadium as a destination
-At universities, there is visitor parking, Faculty/Staff, and Student parking to be designated.