kkervinjones
My feedback
110 results found
-
402 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment In addition, this would also require notification of new Notes going out to all followers of the UR (apart from the Reporter).
-
101 votes
-
31 votes
-
191 votes
-
53 votes
-
68 votes
Thank you to all who submitted and voted for this suggestion, however it is currently not planned due to PII issues associated with tracking URs in this manner. Please make sure to include the UR ID when reporting abusers on the map so that Staff can properly track the case. Often times we are unable to investigate due to no longer having the UR ID once the UR is closed and deleted.
-
15 votes
-
504 votes
Hey,
Please note we're changing the status of this suggestion to Not right now, since we finalized our plans for 2024 and this idea won't be implemented this year.
We hope to include it in our plans for later down the line.
Thanks!
-
75 votes
Thanks to all who submitted and voted on this suggestion! It has been added to our backlog.
-
24 votes
Hey Chris,
As your community manager have also communicated to you via email, this request was sent here by mistake.
We will keep on supporting it with in the correct flow.
Best,
Hezi -
6 votes
-
92 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment In the UK, houses can be named instead of numbered. This is very common in rural parts of the country.
When an App user adds a Residential Place they can add in House Names within the address field. When the Residential Place Update Request reaches WME, we can approve the PUR, but once it's been saved, we cannot edit it due to the restriction WME puts on the Address field (numbers only with letter suffixes). We can't even move the RRP, the only thing we can do is delete it.
This request is to allow House Names to be added and editable in RRPs within WME, to match the capability of the app.
-
6 votes
-
15 votes
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment @turbomkt. Yes, that's correct. The original suggestion was made before the Level 1 editor were restricted from closing URs. This probably makes this suggestion irrelevant now.
-
69 votes
If we change the order, does it make sense that a place under the map comment won’t be selectable?
-
432 votes
-
85 votes
Hey,
We have looked at this suggestion, and in order to make some decisions about it, would like to kindly ask you to provide us with more data about it.
Please share some examples for when and where this restrictions apply? (use cases)
And any country you know relevant for it.
Thanks!
An error occurred while saving the comment Outside of London, here is an example in Manchester:
https://www.waze.com/en-GB/editor/?env=row&lon=-2.19023&lat=53.44315&zoom=6&marker=true&mapComments=234488342.-1950018336.49108 -
54 votes
-
6 votes
Thank you for this suggestion.
After looking into it, this is not something we wish to implement and therefore, this is currently not planed.
Thanks!
Hezi
Thanks for the query. I have mentioned a couple of examples in the request itself, but to clarify:
- I would like to leave notes on URs to inform other editors that a UR is under investigation. This will give them confidence that a UR is being dealt with, even if it's been open for a long time.
- Another editor may have an idea what the actual problem might be with the UR. Using this proposed functionality would allow them to message all followers (except the reporter) without the original reporter being privy to that question or idea. This will save having a Forum PM conversation outside of WME.
- As Mac mentioned below, having a @ tagging system we were can send a message directly to another editor would be useful. This again would not involve the original reporter being notified of that conversation.
I would say preventing the reporter from seeing the conversation in the UR dialogue is not necessary. We just don't want them from being notified by email or in-app for example.