64 results found

1. 2D Hazards

   I'm not sure if this sort of thing will be covered in Permanent Hazards development, but it would be very handy to be able to define an area polygon to which a hazard report would apply.
   To me, the obvious application would be for prolonged construction zones where roads remain open but users ought to be made aware of an issue ahead.
   How I see this working:
   An editor would draw a polygon over the affected area and then choose a hazard type and add an optional comment to the polygon. It should be possible to define schedules and an expiry date.
   In the client this could be rendered as a hazard bubble at every entrance to the polygon, possibly special shading on the segments, or the editor's polygon could be rendered directly on the map.
   Any user comments or photos would be attached to the 2D hazard, and would be viewable by anyone presented with the hazard bubble or alerter.
   Also, the ability for CCP partners to submit this type of object via feed should be considered.

   By: alexs001
   Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=307723

   I'm not sure if this sort of thing will be covered in Permanent Hazards development, but it would be very handy to be able to define an area polygon to which a hazard report would apply.
   To me, the obvious application would be for prolonged construction zones where roads remain open but users ought to be made aware of an issue ahead.
   How I see this working:
   An editor would draw a polygon over the affected area and then choose a hazard type and add an optional comment to the polygon. It should be possible to define schedules and an… more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Prefill city when using a street name suggestion

   When we currently enter the name of a street, we get autocompletion suggestions based on existing roads in the neighbourhood. It would help quite a bit if the associated city field would also be filled in whenever we use one of these suggested road names. I know that every street has a city set (or none, on purpose) in the underlying data model, so this shouldn't be a big effort to add.

   (see Mock up 1 + 2 attached )

   I'm still contemplating whether I'll write a userscript for this or not. It's not so easy to hook into those functions, if I remember correctly.

   Implementation notes:
   To distinguish between nearby street names that exist in two cities (motorway names, for example, but also local roads can sometimes keep their name between cities), it would be best to also show the city name in the suggestions list. At the moment road names show up several times in the suggestions whenever they exist nearby in more than one city, which can be slightly confusing at first.

   If no city is set for the selected street, the 'none' checkbox for the city should be checked as well. It can of course still be changed afterwards, but I suspect that most of the time this would be most practical.

   This behaviour should only activate if a suggestion has not been clicked or has not been navigated to with the down arrow (or any other means of selecting a suggestion that I'm forgetting here). When just typing in a name, the city should not be set automatically.

   Notes about my mock-up
   An alternative for detailing the city name would be using a comma as separator, like it is done when you're not editing the name. Other alternatives: putting it between brackets or making the font smaller. The last one has the advantage that it takes up less space.
   For the first one I had to decrease the left and right padding of the autocompletion to 15px to prevent the dropdown to be covered by the scroll bar. This can probably be done better.
   For the second one I used these CSS properties: font-size:0.7em; padding-left:5px; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase

   by Glodenox
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=250354

   When we currently enter the name of a street, we get autocompletion suggestions based on existing roads in the neighbourhood. It would help quite a bit if the associated city field would also be filled in whenever we use one of these suggested road names. I know that every street has a city set (or none, on purpose) in the underlying data model, so this shouldn't be a big effort to add.

   (see Mock up 1 + 2 attached )

   I'm still contemplating whether I'll write a userscript for this or not. It's not so easy to hook into those… more

   •  

   •  

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

3. House numbers with slash

   Allow add house numbers with slash. For example: 631/29. 639 is for building, 29 is for entrance (Distance between entrances can by big). All block-buildings in my country has this double numbers.Also houses can be marked 10/a 10/b. It is not possible to add this type of number to editor, so usually we have just streets but no one is adding house numbers - as it would be inaccurate to put just first or second number.

   2,796 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  19 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Selecting a search result shouldn't reset the zoom level

   When using the WME search box to find a road, it would be really nice if WME could leave the current zoom level well alone rather than always resetting it to level 3.

   Even if it just defaulted back to level 4 that'd be an improvement, but jumping back out to 3 means we then always have to zoom back in at least one step if we want to be able to select a street segment. And even at L4, anyone looking to do some work on point places would then need to zoom in one step more before they show up... So really, not altering the zoom level at all would be the best choice IMO.

   by Twister-UK
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=276683

   When using the WME search box to find a road, it would be really nice if WME could leave the current zoom level well alone rather than always resetting it to level 3.

   Even if it just defaulted back to level 4 that'd be an improvement, but jumping back out to 3 means we then always have to zoom back in at least one step if we want to be able to select a street segment. And even at L4, anyone looking to do some work on point places would then need to zoom in one step more before they… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close