Skip to content

Anonymous

My feedback

2 results found

  1. 3,425 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
  2. 79 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    How important is this to you?

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    When examining the map the absence of waze report does not, by itself, mean the pathway is free of hazards.

    Roads should optionally display time the road was last "wazed". To Waze a road is to travel down it as an active wazer. In other words, if a wazer travels 10 miles of highway and sees NO activity, be it hazards, police or otherwise, he/she simply doesn't report anything. However, the next wazer to travel down that roadway would benefit to know that as of Hour:Minute the roadway was traveled by a wazer and nothing was reported. (The latter of which is self evident)

    Then the absence of any hazard reports coupled with the date/time the last wazer traveled down that road can be used to calculate the likelihood of a risk. Without the 'last time wazed' information the user can't know if the road is clear or if simply nobody with waze has traveled on it.

    Anonymous supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base