Andrea Roher
My feedback
-
4,936 votes
was not uploaded on 2.2, but still under consideration for the next version.
-
1,174 votes
There are several similar ideas... I like all of them, but separately, they will not likely get enough votes to succeed.
This itinerary planning is a functionality that most stand-alone GPS systems have and one of the only things I miss when using Waze instead of TomTom.
It would be awesome to add related features (including one I've only seen in Microsoft Streets & Trips):
1. Ability to set time ranges on the stops with warnings if there's no way to make the times.
2. Ability to set duration on stops. This will allow for more accurate ETAs, allowing for planned stops.
2. Option to have locations placed in a logical order based on travel (to avoid backtracking). In conjunction with 1 and 2 (above), this would push the stops as needed while still meeting the time range if possible. This is the Streets & Trips feature, and it may not be doable, but if it could be implemented, it would make Waze completely unbeatable. -
27 votes
There are several similar ideas... I like all of them, but separately, they will not likely get enough votes to succeed.
-
78 votes
There are several similar ideas... I like all of them, but separately, they will not likely get enough votes to succeed.
-
2,185 votes
The ability to continue "estimating" your progress when you travel through a tunnel or lose GPS due to heavy cloud cover or whatever is one of the very few ways that Waze is inferior to TomTom. The exact mechanics are much less important to me than that some attempt at estimating takes place.
I think that the "are you in traffic" warning message should default to "no" (it may now, but it didn't recently, and I've tried to be exceptionally vigilant in "switching off" whenever I stop, so I haven't seen the warning recently). But a way to pause and not have to fully switch off would be AWESOME.