676 results found

1. Combined Red Light & Speed Cameras

   The UK now has a growing number of red light cameras that also double-up as speed cameras. These should be able to be captured and displayed/warned as having both functions to drivers.

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

2. Average speed indicating line in carplay sceen
   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

3. WME - Dynamic Speed Camera (Icon).

   Hi.

   It would be a nice touch to add a - Dynamic Speed Camera (Icon), so whatever the user inputs in the Speed Value Box, it will reflect the same on the Icon. I feel this would help new users who think every Speed Camera is (30) but in reality it can be something else.

   Thanks!

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

4. "Check and try again"

   Save error suggestions should provide useful, actionable info to the editor to help them know what to do to solve the problem.

   "Check and try again" isn't helpful. Check what?

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

5. New road type needed between ST to OR

   Passive road type

   Passive mean the penalties attribute doesn't need to use unpaved option.
   And MAY use penalties state similar to PLR

   Most of the road actually vehicles worthy but not qualified as Street (ST) or Off-road/Not maintained (OR supposed for 4X4)

   Most of it drivable and may be the most important route for local or user that knew the road.

   Why this passive RT needed? Majority of user not even know the unpaved switch exists,
   so do to differentiate the unpaved segment shown in apps, this creates complexity for the user to use Waze very well.
   Even with unpaved allowed, most segment maybe not be the best for user to feel safer which might as well going through brushes or palm estate with no street light etc especially for unfamiliar user to that area.

   If disallowed unpave segment will lead to no route toward to destination (please correct me if im wrong)

   In Waze there was NO satellite imagery base map for apps, hence it relies independently to the segments we draw. And we MUST draw/design road network as safer as we can for the public. I found numerous similar complaints in gmaps as well

   Usually this road will be use by local such near farm/village/rural area etc but does not be use as main route suggested by Waze algorithm.

   the criteria MUST fit

   1. The destination route ended at or near the segment
   2. It the only segment toward the destination

   As for now. I and some local community editors, plus being told that other country communities too, also share the same hope for this to be available to be use as officially instead using PLR to managing routing/UR/complaints issues on said area.

   Ignoring this may impacted Waze credibility as a reliable routing apps as proven in my country.

   I dunno how to call this road type. I give it to our volunteers community and waze to give it a name.

   This is IMPORTANT.

   That all.. thanks in advance

   DINKAFTAC

   Passive road type

   Passive mean the penalties attribute doesn't need to use unpaved option.
   And MAY use penalties state similar to PLR

   Most of the road actually vehicles worthy but not qualified as Street (ST) or Off-road/Not maintained (OR supposed for 4X4)

   Most of it drivable and may be the most important route for local or user that knew the road.

   Why this passive RT needed? Majority of user not even know the unpaved switch exists,
   so do to differentiate the unpaved segment shown in apps, this creates complexity for the user to use Waze very well.
   Even with unpaved… more

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

6. Why did you get rid of the 'animals' on the side of the road?

   Why did you get rid of the 'animals' on the side of the road? I now have to alert people about deer, etc by clicking on the general 'hazard'

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

7. Expand original category of a new place

   Today, when adding a new place, we cannot assign to it a specific sub-category at once (except sub-categories of Car Services). We have to assign a generic category, then remove it and either enter the sub-category directly, or add again the proper category, expand it, and select the sub-category from the list. I suggest enabling expanding of the originally assigned category similar to categories added later.

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

8. Please can you introduce sub and sub-sub folders etc. for saved places.

   It would be great to be able to have and categorise sub folders with labels such as restaurants, hospitals, friends, clients etc.. These might be further nested to a higher level by area, county or country for example.
   It is really very cumbersome to scroll through hundreds of saved places to find the one I want. When I travel abroad I have different countries places all mixed together in one long list. With nested sub folders, finding a particular saved place could be done in mere seconds.

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

9. Inclusão de Semáforos, sem ou radar de velocidade.

   I propose the implementation of marking all traffic lights, even those without speed radar, in the Waze app’s mapping system. This feature aims to enhance the navigation experience, provide greater driver safety, and enable more accurate and efficient routes.

   Including traffic lights on the Waze map would allow:

   1. Greater Accuracy in Route Time Calculation: By accounting for waiting times at traffic lights, Waze’s algorithm could offer more precise route estimates, preventing unexpected delays for users.

   2. Suggestion of Faster and Safer Routes: With the location of traffic lights known, Waze could suggest alternative routes, avoiding intersections that require longer waiting times and catering to users’ preference for faster routes.

   3. Easier Navigation in Urban and Unfamiliar Areas: Marking traffic lights would aid drivers navigating unfamiliar areas, enhancing safety by providing alerts about controlled intersections and allowing drivers to prepare for stops.

   4. Fuel Consumption Optimization and Emissions Reduction: This feature would enable users to opt for routes with fewer traffic lights, reducing the number of stops and starts, positively impacting fuel consumption and emissions reduction.

   5. Reduction of Accidents and Traffic Violations: Notifications of approaching traffic lights help prevent red-light running and increase driver alertness in intersection areas, contributing to road safety.

   6. Average Waiting Time Indication at Traffic Lights
      
      Description: Beyond marking the location of traffic lights, Waze could display the average waiting time at each traffic light based on historical and real-time data, alerting drivers to intersections that cause significant delays.
      
      Benefits: This feature allows drivers to anticipate waiting times, adjusting their route or speed according to the wait time, thus improving trip planning.

   7. Alerts for Traffic Light Timing Changes Based on Time of Day
      
      Description: Many traffic lights adjust the green/red light duration based on the time of day. Waze could integrate these variations and provide alerts for timing changes during specific periods, such as peak hours.
      
      Benefits: Drivers are informed about waiting time changes, which increases the accuracy of arrival estimates and improves route selection during high-traffic times.

   8. “Green Wave” Notifications for Synchronized Traffic Lights
      
      Description: In locations where traffic lights are synchronized to form a “green wave” (a sequence of green lights), Waze could indicate this possibility, recommending an ideal speed for drivers to pass through several intersections without stopping.
      
      Benefits: This increases trip fluidity, avoiding unnecessary stops and contributing to more economical and less interrupted driving.

   9. Alerts for Traffic Lights with a Record of Accidents
      Description: Some traffic lights are in areas with high accident rates. Waze could highlight these points with caution alerts when approaching traffic lights known for incidents, even suggesting a safe approach speed.
      
      Benefits: This feature enhances road safety by alerting drivers in higher-risk areas and encouraging more cautious driving.

   10. Integration of Traffic Light Information with Driving Assistants in Smart Cars
       
       Description: For vehicles equipped with driving assistants, Waze could share information about the location and status of traffic lights, allowing the car to adjust speed and plan stops more precisely.
       
       Benefits: Integration with smart vehicles increases safety and driving efficiency, especially in urban areas with frequent stops.

   11. Optimized Route Studies for Traffic Lights at Off-Peak Hours
       
       Description: With traffic light data on the map, Waze could suggest optimized routes during late night or low-traffic times, avoiding intersections with slow traffic lights and proposing more direct paths.
       
       Benefits: Reduces travel time and fuel consumption during low-traffic hours, providing users with a quick and smooth navigation experience.

   12. Approach Notifications for Hidden Traffic Lights (Curves, Hills)
       Description: In areas where traffic light visibility is reduced (such as after a sharp curve or on an uphill road), Waze could issue visual and sound alerts in advance, preparing drivers to stop.
       
       Benefits: Increases safety in low-visibility areas, helping drivers avoid sudden braking and risky situations.

   13. Indication of Priority Lanes at Controlled Intersections
       Description: At intersections where there are specific priority lanes (such as left-turn lanes or bus-only lanes), Waze could display these indications, helping drivers position themselves correctly in advance.
       
       Benefits: Improves traffic flow by avoiding last-minute lane changes and helps drivers follow road markings correctly, reducing the risk of violations.

   Map updates can be carried out through collaborative information from Waze map editors, as well as government data on traffic light locations. I also suggest the option of customizing alerts, allowing users to choose whether to receive notifications when approaching traffic lights according to their preference.

   The implementation of traffic light markings on Waze is an innovative proposal, with the potential to improve the precision, safety, and efficiency of navigation. This feature, by adding a new layer of relevant information for users, could elevate the quality of service and make Waze an even more complete tool for urban mobility.

   agsillva

   I propose the implementation of marking all traffic lights, even those without speed radar, in the Waze app’s mapping system. This feature aims to enhance the navigation experience, provide greater driver safety, and enable more accurate and efficient routes.

   Including traffic lights on the Waze map would allow:

   1. Greater Accuracy in Route Time Calculation: By accounting for waiting times at traffic lights, Waze’s algorithm could offer more precise route estimates, preventing unexpected delays for users.

   2. Suggestion of Faster and Safer Routes: With the location of traffic lights known, Waze could suggest alternative routes, avoiding intersections that require longer waiting times… more

   9 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   Submit Rating

10. Excluding Specific Road Types in Polygons Based Events

    I would like to propose an improvement to the "Polygons Based Events" by adding an option to exclude certain types of roads, similar to the school zone alerts.

    In my case, I want to set up a PBE for major roadworks, but a highway crosses at a lower level and will be notified of this event even though it is not affected.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

11. Automatically add street when adding a point location

    As a waze level 2 editor, when adding a residential place, I'd like for the street to be automatically pre-filled with the closest segment in the map.

    I have been adding a lot of residential places in my zone and I have to copy the street name and paste in each place I add. This process would be more expedite if street name is filled with the closest segment on the map and would avoid errors of places in streets different than the one they are put into.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

12. Validation workflow & access to all functions

    Hello,

    I'm a current level 3 Area Manager and every day I have to deal with bottlenecks because I don't have the necessary level to make changes.
    So I have to find a L4 or L5 to do it, explain it to them and get the result.
    This is very time-consuming and somewhat archaic these days.

    I'd like to suggest the following:
    Be able to give all editors access to all functions or perhaps from L2 or L3 if we want there to be a minimum of editing experience. As well as adding a validation workflow for functions that currently require a higher level.

    In my case, this would allow me to make all the changes and, if some of them require a higher level, to submit a validation request to the higher levels.
    It's smoother and simpler.

    For example, I want to add lanes or speed bumps, but today I can't. With this change, I'll be able to add them and submit them, and an L4 or L5 will then have to validate or reject my edit (this system is in place for certain modifications, so why not extend it more widely?)

    Thank you,
    Yves

    Hello,

    I'm a current level 3 Area Manager and every day I have to deal with bottlenecks because I don't have the necessary level to make changes.
    So I have to find a L4 or L5 to do it, explain it to them and get the result.
    This is very time-consuming and somewhat archaic these days.

    I'd like to suggest the following:
    Be able to give all editors access to all functions or perhaps from L2 or L3 if we want there to be a minimum of editing experience. As well as adding a validation workflow for functions that currently… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

13. Lane guidance: Make "View Only" and "View and Hear" behaviors consistent for "continue straight" lanes

    In WME we have two options if we want to force "continue" lane guidance to be surfaced to the user - view only, and view and hear (or more recently, with and without audible instructions).

    Aside from the obvious difference in whether or not an audible instruction is issued to "use the Left 3 lanes to continue straight ..." or only a visual instruction, there's another more subtle behavior change that is not always welcome - namely, if you use the "View and Hear" option, it is additionally treated as a "Continue" TIO (turn instruction override). This means that, if View and Hear is chosen, when you are many miles away from the junction in question the "next turn" in the navigation list will be at the point of this junction, rather than the next actual turn, whereas if you choose "view only", you'll get visual LG about a half mile from the junction but otherwise the "next turn" will be where you'd expect it to be, at the next actual turn maneuver or exit you need to take.

    It is my opinion that these two behaviors should be decoupled - we have access to the Continue TIO if we want/need it for a particular junction, duplicating that functionality on the lane guidance is unexpected behavior and should be changed to simply announce the LG at the same location that view only would show it, without silently also duplicating the "continue" TIO behavior which may or may not be desired at a particular junction.

    In WME we have two options if we want to force "continue" lane guidance to be surfaced to the user - view only, and view and hear (or more recently, with and without audible instructions).

    Aside from the obvious difference in whether or not an audible instruction is issued to "use the Left 3 lanes to continue straight ..." or only a visual instruction, there's another more subtle behavior change that is not always welcome - namely, if you use the "View and Hear" option, it is additionally treated as a "Continue" TIO (turn instruction override). This means that, if… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

14. Better support for Rural map editors

    I live in a VERY rural area. Quite often, I'll be driving but not get EA credit because I didn't have cell service. I can literally drive for 50+mi without any cell coverage. I drove 530 miles two days ago and maybe got credit for half of it.

    I'd like it if map editors would have the ability to turn on some sort of feature in the app that saves their location history until cell service is restored. Also, as I have seen others suggest, a larger EA radius from a given drive would be very helpful out here as I cannot possibly drive every back road around here...

    I live in a VERY rural area. Quite often, I'll be driving but not get EA credit because I didn't have cell service. I can literally drive for 50+mi without any cell coverage. I drove 530 miles two days ago and maybe got credit for half of it.

    I'd like it if map editors would have the ability to turn on some sort of feature in the app that saves their location history until cell service is restored. Also, as I have seen others suggest, a larger EA radius from a given drive would be very helpful out here as… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

15. Streamlining changes for adding house numbers

    I'd like to suggest two related changes regarding the addition of house numbers. These are small changes, but in UI design, frictions like this can add up when one is performing the same action over and over.

    1. Always keep the text field active when selecting a house number point

    After clicking to add a house number, the text field to enter the number is automatically active and can be typed in (which is great!) But, when clicking and dragging either the house number itself or the entry point, the cursor goes away, and one has to click the number field again to be able to enter a house number. Even worse, dragging the entry point along the road doesn't work at all, as it deselects the entire house number! To move the entry point, you have to deselect the house number by clicking outside of it, then click on it to reselect it, then click and drag on the entry point.

    The solution to this is to make the text field stay active when the house number is selected, even when dragging either of the points (or have the cursor dissapear momentarily but come back when you release the drag). One should also be able to drag the entry point without it deselecting the house number. That way, the user can perform any of the three actions (moving the house number point, moving the entry point, and editing the number itself) in any order, even more than once, without having to move their mouse around like a maniac.

    As a person with clumsy fingers that uses WME on a laptop, I would say about 30% of my time doing house numbers is spent fixing typos or misclicks. The change seems small, but if you're doing hundreds of house numbers on the same street and having to click three or four times per house number, it gets frustrating very quickly.

    1. When the entry point has been moved already, lock it in place when moving the house number point

    When doing house numbers, I place the point, input the number, and then move the entry point to the correct location. Sometimes, though, I will realize that the house number is misaligned after I do this, and move it to the correct position. The problem is, this resets the position of the entry point, because as the house number moves, the entry point is set to the nearest point on the road.

    I would propose that, if the user has already moved the entry point along the road for a given house number, it should assume it is at the correct location. So, if I go to move the house number itself, the entry point should stay where it is. If the entry point is not moved, however, it should behave as it does now, because it is nice to be able to drag along a house number and have its entry point come with it if I misclicked the location.

    Thank you for your consideration!
    - Catalyzzt

    I'd like to suggest two related changes regarding the addition of house numbers. These are small changes, but in UI design, frictions like this can add up when one is performing the same action over and over.

    1. Always keep the text field active when selecting a house number point

    After clicking to add a house number, the text field to enter the number is automatically active and can be typed in (which is great!) But, when clicking and dragging either the house number itself or the entry point, the cursor goes away, and one has to click the number field… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

16. Add an Option to keep or Removed Wazer icon from URs

    With the new Release, we got a new UR icon design that has the Wazer on it, and i have seen many different opinions about it.
    i think it would be great to have an option to decide how you want your URs to look, either have the Wazer on it or without the Wazer on it. as there is a lot of editors that like the new look, but there are also some that would like to have it as before. so this would solve this problem without removing the new look of the URs.

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

17. Consolidate the two WME suggestion boxes

    Please consolidate the two Uservoice-based WME suggestion boxes. There has been a "Waze Map Editor" subcategory of the "Waze Suggestion Box" for at least a few years, and due to default links and navigation that is still an easier suggestion box to find than this one. Or, is there a reason to have two different suggestion boxes for WME?

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

18. WME Chat Time Stamps

    WME Chat should have a time stamp so we know when someone commented.

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

19. Optimize Road Shield Display on all Live Map Zoom Levels

    Different zoom levels of Livemap appears to display road shields differently some of the "higher" zoom levels shows so many shields that it is distracting and does not look polished. All zoom levels should be optimized to group shields so that the map isn't littered with shields.

    Please see example screenshots

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating

20. Mark segments as "slip lanes" that delay voice instructions

    At the moment, ramp segments generally delay voice instructions until you have merged or turned onto the segments at the end of the ramp, such as a freeway or highway.

    Australia and some other countries utilise "slip lanes" at some intersections, which is basically a left turn (for countries that drive on the left) that does not use the main intersection.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slip_lane

    When a slip lane is mapped on Waze, we usually implement the turn instruction where the driver enters the slip lane, as that is where they need to be told to turn. However, this can mean that Waze gives the next instruction, which may be either nearby or a fair distance away, while the driver is still on the slip lane. At this point the driver may not be able to hear the instruction because they're focusing on watching the traffic so that they can turn, causing them to effectively miss the voice instruction.

    If we could mark a segment on the WME as a "slip lane", this could allow Waze to delay the next voice instruction until the driver has turned onto the next road, in the same way Waze already does with ramp segments. I think this would be a great way to ensure that directions are given at a more ideal time for the driver.

    At the moment, ramp segments generally delay voice instructions until you have merged or turned onto the segments at the end of the ramp, such as a freeway or highway.

    Australia and some other countries utilise "slip lanes" at some intersections, which is basically a left turn (for countries that drive on the left) that does not use the main intersection.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slip_lane

    When a slip lane is mapped on Waze, we usually implement the turn instruction where the driver enters the slip lane, as that is where they need to be told to turn. However, this can mean that Waze… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  General  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    Submit Rating