sulstore
My feedback
35 results found
-
99 votes
-
158 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on the display the capture date of Satellite image. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
An error occurred while saving the comment -
83 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on New Satellite Imagery available for L1. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
An error occurred while saving the comment I advised a mentee to always use the most recent satellite imagery, switching to an alternative only when the latest one is obscured by clouds. However, I discovered that level 1 (L1) editors do not have access to these newer images. For instance, a road that appears as paved in the most recent imagery is still shown as a dirt road in the default imagery; this discrepancy can lead to incorrect map edits. I see no reason why the most recent imagery shouldn't be made available to L1 editors as well.
-
600 votes
-
1,424 votes
-
59 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on adding a Serial Number field to Speed Cameras in WME. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
-
26 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Concordo totalmente, vamos discutir no próximo meetup.
-
85 votes
-
106 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
-
80 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on it. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
An error occurred while saving the comment WME Rapid Koi Roads does this: https://www.waze.com/discuss/t/script-wme-rapid-koi-roads/357670
-
134 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment I’ve been thinking about this: Waze has the Koi Fish project, which aims to unify maps so they reflect reality more consistently. In the real world, a road is represented in a single way, but in Waze, we have maps drawn differently, like X and Y. The project's goal is precisely to achieve this unification.
However, why is the logic different when it comes to places? Why do we use two separate databases (Google Maps and Waze), when in the real world there’s only one reference? I know the integration process is complex, but it’s worth thinking "outside the box."
If Waze were mine (laughs), here’s what I would do:
Remove the option to add Places directly in the app and in WME.
Link the existing Places in WME to their corresponding Places in Google Maps, creating a direct relationship between the databases.
Send divergent or unique cases to editors for review, ensuring data consistency before integration.
Unify the Places databases into Google Maps, as it is a broader and more reliable reference. Google usually has more up-to-date information about a place’s activity (whether it’s active or permanently closed), as most of the time it’s the owner themselves who makes these updates.
Allow WME to load Places from Google Maps as a unified database, consolidated with the old Places from WME.
Reintroduce the options to add Places directly through WME and the app, but now with a unified and centralized database, making management easier and reducing errors.
These new Places would be registered in a single database and would automatically reflect in both platforms (Google Maps and Waze), where it would also be possible to define their arrival point as usual.If none of this is enough to convince Waze of the need for these changes, please consider reinstating the functionality of WME PIE. It is essential for addressing map issues, correctly linking locations, and ensuring that drivers reach their destinations accurately, providing an excellent navigation experience. Without this tool, we cannot guarantee the quality of user report handling.
-
192 votes
-
168 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
An error occurred while saving the comment Voted! As a developer, I say this is extremely simple to solve.
-
137 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
-
179 votes
Great thinking! We’ll share with the team; they’re always interested in new feature ideas.
-
378 votes
-
9 votes
-
2 votes
-
5 votes
-
22 votes
I’ve been asking for this at meetups for many years; hopefully, it will be implemented soon.