Paulo Gustavo
Mi Feedback
39 resultados encontrados
-
8 votos
-
363 votos
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Se produjo un error al guardar el comentario. -
39 votos
Se produjo un error al guardar el comentario. May I add a follow-up to the suggestion?
I understand that building a simulator “from scratch” inside WME would be complex. So my proposal is that the simulator could instead run inside the Waze app itself.
What do I mean by that? The editor would use one of those secret debug codes full of @ and # to unlock a cheat that simulates movement as if the user were physically located somewhere else. Basically, the editor would define a start point and a destination, and then watch the movement on the phone screen at a fixed speed, exactly as if real navigation were taking place.
To me, this seems much simpler to implement. What do you think?
-
14 votos
-
4 votos
Se produjo un error al guardar el comentario. Totally agree! There’s more than enough space to display both pieces of information on the left side — at least on CarPlay.
-
114 votos
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
-
9 votos
-
3 votos
Thanks for contacting us about reporting an error on the map. Our community of volunteer map editors handle all changes to the Waze map.
To report a map issue in the Waze App
To report an issue on the Waze Live Map
To suggest an edit to the map-editing community
Note that it may take some time for them to review your request.
-
50 votos
-
14 votos
-
26 votos
Se produjo un error al guardar el comentario. Indeed, whenever you add a new segment, you are required to fill in the Street Name. Otherwise, the segment remains “bleeding.”
I fully understand that requiring a Street Name may originally have been a strategy to prevent the uncontrolled creation of unnamed segments. This was also the approach used for segments created directly from the app via the Pave tool.
Today, however, this requirement has become an obstacle in the editor’s workflow. The editor has to perform no fewer than four clicks: expand the address box, expand the dropdown for Street Name, select “None,” and then confirm. This is a non-trivial amount of work for every new segment - and it still does not ensure that the editor actually provides a Street Name.
At this point, we already have a much more mature division of labor among editors, as well as several tools (scripts) for tagging and reviewing unnamed segments.
It is also worth noting that the Street Name is the only mandatory field in the address set:
* if you do not fill in the City, WME automatically sets it to “None”;
* State and Country are already prefilled by WME.
I therefore suggest allowing the user to save a segment without entering a Street Name, exactly the same way it already works for the City field.
Also, this idea complies with the C.A.R.™ formula:
* Cheap: easy for Waze devs to implement;
* Aligned: it does not break or undermine the platform’s logic;
* Relevant: it has a significant impact on a real problem faced by editors.
-
144 votos
-
1 voto
-
101 votos
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We're pleased to confirm that this suggestion is planned and we appreciate your input as we continue to enhance our product.
-
26 votos
-
2 votos
-
2 votos
-
2 votos
-
2 votos
-
3 votos
May I add a follow-up to the suggestion?
I understand that building a simulator “from scratch” inside WME would be complex. So my proposal is that the simulator could instead run inside the Waze app itself.
What do I mean by that? The editor would use one of those secret debug codes full of @ and # to unlock a cheat that simulates movement as if the user were physically located somewhere else. Basically, the editor would define a start point and a destination, and then watch the movement on the phone screen at a fixed speed, exactly as if real navigation were taking place.
To me, this seems much simpler to implement. What do you think?