BryceCampbell
My feedback
17 results found
-
131 votes
-
23 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
2 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Sounds like something to get in-touch with the editor community and/or enroll your company into the Waze for Cities partner program.
https://sites.google.com/view/wazertowazer/partners
https://sites.google.com/view/wazertowazer/resources-for-everyone/join-community-channels
https://sites.google.com/view/wazertowazer/resources-for-everyone/join-community-channels
-
12 votes
-
44 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Russ' example is spot on! There are imports of commercial/residential complexes that will be like 10+ (I've seen 20-30) units spread across the property, but in reality they are all in one area.
Cannot merge cause you have to pick on set of chargers.Another example too is where the importer will generate one EVCS for the L3 DCFC and another for the L2 unit. Both these units are in the same location, same price, and same network. There really isn't any benefit to having these separate in most of these cases.
Again we cannot merge them cause merging EVCS feed places makes you select one or the other. -
465 votes
-
550 votes
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment will vote this up. While Waze is primarily a commute/driving app, it is used for inter-city travel and on non-controlled 2-lane highways, its quite common to go 20-50 km without a "safe" passing lane.
While one "can" pass while the yellow-line is dashed (least in Canada) its stressful and dangerous. If the Waze app detects a slowdown for a set time, it could have a popup (like the speed limit reduction/high accident zone popup) that says Passing lane x km).
-
18 votes
-
50 votes
-
137 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on reordering custom turn instruction elements. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
-
3,749 votes
-
920 votes
Hey,
Please note we're changing the status of this suggestion to Not right now, since we finalized our plans for 2023 and this idea won't be implemented this year.
We hope to have it included in our plans for later years and will keep you posted.
Thanks! -
95 votes
-
429 votes
-
117 votes
-
74 votes
Will happily resurrect this thread for 2024!
With permanent hazards now, it would be amazing to have one-lane (crossing)/yield to on-coming traffic for situations just like this.
In British Columbia Canada, I've been working on doing some basemap updating and we have a lot of two lane highways. They are critical for essential access but they don't have the traffic volumes (or sometimes space, or both) to justify building a two-lane bridge.
As such these crossings are one-lane traffic, the one direction (general outbound) will have the rightaway, while the other direction will yield to the on-coming. So its going to essentially have a two-part hazards - one a PH of one-lane bridge(traffic) and another for one-lane bridge plus a yield.
Having this hazard would be anxcellent enhancement to the Permanent hazard alerts.
Couple of Streetview examples
WB one-lane with yield https://maps.app.goo.gl/m157W2fqNwcQXkzj6
EB one-lane w/o yield https://maps.app.goo.gl/aKToCLVnuXV5nigq9
This bridge has single lane approaches you'll yield to traffic, along with another yield to traffic at the bridge crest.
https://maps.app.goo.gl/8JeWJ163FJt4QzyAA