Anonymous
My feedback
10 results found
-
6,682 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
-
2,246 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
760 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
723 votes
Thank you for your suggestion. We will add this voice request to our User Request wish-list.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,215 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
1,670 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
2,262 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1,926 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
-
3,217 votes
What we are aiming to do here is speed based alerters.
Anonymous
supported this idea
·
-
4,026 votesAnonymous
supported this idea
·
I think there really needs to be some more specific lane data, at least about hazards and accidents. I have passed a whole large and thick tire in the middle of the road, which was hidden because of other cars ahead. If I hadn't pulled on the adjacent lane just a few seconds earlier by chance, I would have gotten come very serious damage to the underside of my car. Several times, gigantic potholes have almost ripped my tire off.
Lane specificity is a must to prevent incidents like this.
Also, flood gauge or depth reports would help, by lane if possible. 1 inch of flooding is nothing and could provide a safe route to escape an even more devastated area, although a large visible timestamp is essential too for this because conditions change rapidly during a flood. Reporting 5 feet of flooding that looks like less could save many lives. Hurricane Harvey and flooding earlier in Houston made that very clear.
https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=251&t=254879&p=1809307#p1809307