tenetienne
My feedback
35 results found
-
63 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
44 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
93 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
4 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
40 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
37 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
24 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
39 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
30 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
94 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment tenetienne supported this idea · -
33 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
tenetienne supported this idea · -
152 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment tenetienne commentedIt's not making it easier for editors having to click to remove something that doesn't need to be there.
-
77 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
23 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
44 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
tenetienne supported this idea · -
32 votes
Hey!
Thank you for this suggestion.As it was announced in the forum we are currently working on improving the SLUR workflow and user experience.
This suggestion will be taken into consideration in the work.So, thank you again we will update accordingly.
Hezi
tenetienne supported this idea · -
70 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
293 votestenetienne supported this idea ·
-
85 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
tenetienne supported this idea ·
If it is going to be changed, there isn't any reason to leave the field with information that is already incorrect.