Anonymous
My feedback
22 results found
-
40 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
169 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
74 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous commentedHi Marianne Lucy,
I'm a volunteer Waze map editor, and one of the volunteer state managers here in New Hampshire.
The bad result is actually coming from a Google Maps location that is incorrect. You can see the Google Maps location that is causing the issue here: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Dianas+Baths/@44.0761793,-71.1909268,15z/data=!3m1!4b1!4m6!3m5!1s0x4cb39f62f310f3c7:0x3a5440eeca0f13e4!8m2!3d44.0761803!4d-71.1806271!16s%2Fg%2F1tdrdzl5?entry=ttu
Unfortunately, this particular Google Maps location does not appear to have a way for users to edit/update. I have linked the bad location to the Waze map place that was added to the Waze map in order to hopefully fix the issue for new searches.
Please remove any instance of this location from your history and favorites.
You can then search for the corrected location.
If you don't remove the old results from the search or favorites, you will continue to be routed to the incorrect location.
-
111 votes
We plan to work on creating an issue tracker for UR in the near future.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
49 votes
Great timing! We're currently working on defaulting new users in the US and UK to Imperial units. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
42 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
180 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on allowing Junction Boxes and Paths to exist together. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
72 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
79 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
108 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
110 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
147 votes
Thank you for this suggestion.
We are looking into its feasibility on our end, and will update accordingly
Best,
Anonymous supported this idea · -
75 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
99 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
49 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
318 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
181 votes
Thanks for supporting this suggestion! We've added it to the WME team's backlog, and hope to get to it in the near future. We will follow up here when we have an update, or need more info from the community.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
22 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
236 votes
Hey!
Thank you for this suggestion.
This is not a priority for the team at the moment and we won’t move forward with it.
We encourage you to keep on coming up with great suggestions
Best,
Anonymous supported this idea ·
Yes, please either make the checkbox work without having to go into the filter menu and click apply - which, as said, is not at all obvious - or put the checkbox in the filter menu.