DwarfLord
My feedback
95 results found
-
127 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
383 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
53 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment -
42 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
16 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
45 votes
DwarfLord
shared this idea
·
-
117 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
134 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
151 votes
Great thinking! We’ll share with the team; they’re always interested in new feature ideas.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
204 votes
Thank you for this suggestion.
We are looking into its feasibility on our end, and will update accordingly
Best,
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
116 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
104 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment
DwarfLord
commented
The significant technical obstacle to what you describe is that Waze is, at its core, about speed and "beating traffic". It works by measuring the speed of Wazing traffic at different times of day.
If bicyclists were to use Waze, they would severely pollute these speed data. This could foul the very reason Waze exists in the first place.
Consequently, in the US we do everything we can to *discourage* bicyclists from using Waze. It's important that the speed data that Waze acquires be representative of motor-vehicle traffic, not a mix of motor vehicle and bicycle speeds.
It seems unlikely Waze would go for this, as it could harm the foundational algorithms underlying the app (all IMHO, of course).
-
15 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
34 votes
DwarfLord
shared this idea
·
-
9 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
50 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
73 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
46 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
-
29 votes
DwarfLord
supported this idea
·
I wholeheartedly endorse this idea. Right now if we want to be sure routing-by-address works in shopping centers we have to add a completely separate Residential Point Place (RPP) with exactly the same information that's in the standard Point Place for the store and located in the same spot. This is pure duplicated effort, and a huge amount of extra work when multiplied by all the stores in a complex. Many editors are not drawn to put in the effort, and routing by address fails. All it would take is a simple "Allow routing by address" checkbox. Please implement this!