DwarfLord
My feedback
69 results found
-
43 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
64 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
26 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
36 votes
Thanks for the suggestion!
We currently don't have plans to institute this change right now, but this may be included in future changes to SATmap options.
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
30 votes
Hey!
Thank you for the suggestion.
In order to check this suggestion, we would like you to share some more examples with us.
We aim to get the understanding of how often this is an issue.Best,
Hezi.DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
96 votes
Thank you for submitting this suggestion!
At the moment, when you hover over a place, it shows its complete address. Is this something that solves the original issue you mentioned?
If not, we would love to hear from you on how it can be improved.
Thank you!
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
82 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
24 votes
Hi all,
Thanks for this suggestion. We currently have other features which can account for this, like Roadshields and the towards option.
Editors should continue to avoid creating short segments where they aren't necessary, however this issue will be resolved by other future feature releases.
Many thanks,
Waze Communities Team
An error occurred while saving the comment DwarfLord shared this idea ·
-
46 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment DwarfLord commented
> Maybe also critical map comments shouldn't be able to be hidden via the layers menu?
That is a GREAT idea! As long as it only applies to comment points, not comment areas, as editors need to be able to hide comment areas in order to work efficiently underneath them.
DwarfLord shared this idea ·
-
86 votes
Hey!
This request is currently under consideration.
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
79 votes
Hey,
We have looked at this suggestion, and in order to make some decisions about it, would like to kindly ask you to provide us with more data about it.
Please share some examples for when and where this restrictions apply? (use cases)
And any country you know relevant for it.
Thanks!
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
94 votes
Hey,
This topic may not answered as part of the suggestion up until now, but it has been discussed multiple times across the relevant teams.
We will keep on updating with any news
Best,
HeziDwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
16 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
28 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
152 votes
Thanks for submitting this idea!
We're looking into the suggestion and will update if we have any more questions or a solution to share.
-Waze Communities Team
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
180 votes
DwarfLord supported this idea ·
-
5 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment DwarfLord commented
I think the real problem is that editors are underusing Map-Comment points. It is not surprising, as MC Points are often hard to notice. I have direct experience with ranking editors who should know better making changes without respecting critical information in adjacent MC Points. I can only assume it is because the Points didn't stand out enough and weren't noticed. So I have been using MC Areas more frequently, though I'd rather use MC Points.
So perhaps the real solution is to make MC Points more visible? Larger? More colorful? Somehow harder to miss. Then encourage editing communities to rely more heavily on MC Points than MC Areas.
MC Areas are needed for certain situations, but they are indeed intrusive, and I too find myself forced to switch off the comment layer to really see what is going on under them.
-
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment DwarfLord commented
I have passed this request to the Florida volunteer editors' group.
-
25 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment DwarfLord commented
There is no requirement in WME to provide lane guidance at any given intersection. Adding (or removing) lane guidance is entirely voluntary on the part of the editor, acting under (hopefully) the general guidance of the local editing community. Now, whether some editors or editing communities may have gotten carried away adding lane guidance in situations where it doesn't help or may even detract from the driver's experience -- that is a different question.
It does appear that the team missed the suggestion's intent. The suggestion was extremely simple. At present, WME allows any editor, of any experience, for ANY purpose (including as a byproduct of other work or even by accident), to create very short segments with lengths as little as 1 m. Should WME really allow creation of such extremely short segments, when they are said to cause routing problems?
The suggestion had nothing to do with giving advanced editors better ways of adjusting instructions (e.g. with informational short segments).