Jackson
My feedback
16 results found
-
375 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
266 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
920 votes
Hey,
Please note we're changing the status of this suggestion to Not right now, since we finalized our plans for 2023 and this idea won't be implemented this year.
We hope to have it included in our plans for later years and will keep you posted.
Thanks!Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
587 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
2,342 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
1,741 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
1,989 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
1,873 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
3,292 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Thank you to all who submitted and voted for this suggestion, however it is currently not planned due to PII issues associated with tracking URs in this manner. Please make sure to include the UR ID when reporting abusers on the map so that Staff can properly track the case. Often times we are unable to investigate due to no longer having the UR ID once the UR is closed and deleted.
Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
14 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
commented
I believe you can do this via the live map. Right-click the location, click Report a Problem, select the problem type, and type a description.
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
commented
I think there should potentially be some extra criteria for imagery that is submitted, as well as a way to reject submitted imagery. Specifically images of new junction styles and interchanges, and maybe subdivisions, should be priority.
Jackson
shared this idea
·
-
96 votesJackson
shared this idea
·
-
2,064 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
8 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
Jackson
shared this idea
·
For URs that are harder to resolve, it would be nice to communicate about the steps already taken to try to fix the problem, without bothering the reporter or confusing them with editor jargon. Or, if another editor asks a reporter for additional information and you are familiar with the issue, to have the option to better explain the issue without speaking for the reporter.