Jackson
My feedback
12 results found
-
478 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
271 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
604 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
1,856 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
2,119 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
1,881 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
74 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
-
68 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Jackson
supported this idea
·
-
18 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
commented
I believe you can do this via the live map. Right-click the location, click Report a Problem, select the problem type, and type a description.
-
12 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Jackson
commented
I think there should potentially be some extra criteria for imagery that is submitted, as well as a way to reject submitted imagery. Specifically images of new junction styles and interchanges, and maybe subdivisions, should be priority.
Jackson
shared this idea
·
-
111 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Jackson
shared this idea
·
-
8 votesJackson
supported this idea
·
Jackson
shared this idea
·
For URs that are harder to resolve, it would be nice to communicate about the steps already taken to try to fix the problem, without bothering the reporter or confusing them with editor jargon. Or, if another editor asks a reporter for additional information and you are familiar with the issue, to have the option to better explain the issue without speaking for the reporter.