939 results found

1. Suppress Live Map Overlay

   Recently a change to Live Map introduced an overlay and call to action footer with information on how to download the Waze app when the URL contains a permalink to a location.

   (Image attached)

   While this is great for users that have not yet been introduced to Waze, map editors do not need to see it every time they open Live Map from within WME. Fortunately, if the following query string parameters are appended to the URL, both the overlay and call to action are suppressed:
   While this is great for users that have not yet been introduced to Waze, map editors do not need to see it every time they open Live Map from within WME. Fortunately, if the following query string parameters are appended to the URL, both the overlay and call to action are suppressed:

   CODE: SELECT ALL
   &overlay=false&cta=false

   The difference is:
   Without overlay suppression: https://beta.waze.com/livemap?lon=-73.9 ... 95&zoom=14
   With overlay suppression: https://beta.waze.com/livemap?lon=-73.9 ... &cta=false

   Would you consider adding this to the Live Map link in the lower right hand corner of WME?

   Also as a link to the location of edits in Live Map is also provided in the Editor Profile under Recent Edits (https://www.waze.com/user/editor/Joyriding) it would be appreciated if that URL could be updated as well.

   Alternatively, a compromise could be only displaying the overlay once every X days, but would require a change to Live Map.

   Thank you.

   The difference is:
   Without overlay suppression: https://beta.waze.com/livemap?lon=-73.9 ... 95&zoom=14
   With overlay suppression: https://beta.waze.com/livemap?lon=-73.9 ... &cta=false

   Would you consider adding this to the Live Map link in the lower right hand corner of WME?

   Also as a link to the location of edits in Live Map is also provided in the Editor Profile under Recent Edits (https://www.waze.com/user/editor/Joyriding) it would be appreciated if that URL could be updated as well.

   Alternatively, a compromise could be only displaying the overlay once every X days, but would require a change to Live Map.

   Thank you.

   by Joyriding
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=280307

   Recently a change to Live Map introduced an overlay and call to action footer with information on how to download the Waze app when the URL contains a permalink to a location.

   (Image attached)

   While this is great for users that have not yet been introduced to Waze, map editors do not need to see it every time they open Live Map from within WME. Fortunately, if the following query string parameters are appended to the URL, both the overlay and call to action are suppressed:
   While this is great for users that have not yet been introduced to Waze,… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you for this suggestion.
   This suggestion is related to Live Map and not WME.

   In addition, We don’t have the overlay anymore, and therefor we won’t move forward with the suggestion.

   Thanks!
   Hezi

2. Link points POI to an Area POI

   Hi guys,

   The idea is to link points POI to a Area POI.
   For example, linking stores in a Mall or linking a company office in a building.
   It's also to avoid this kind of editions : https://www.waze.com/editor?env=row&lon ... 157&zoom=6.
   I think this will help editors to determinate which stores or companies are present in a Mall/building and help user to use the right entry to go to shopping or working.
   It will be a plus if you can also link, a point POI entry on an Area POI entry.

   by Ardillon42
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=278179

   6 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you for this suggestion.

   The work around this topic is related to a bigger changes and improvements in the WME which were not prioritise.

   Therefore, this is currently not planned.

   Best,
   Hezi

3. Selecting a search result shouldn't reset the zoom level

   When using the WME search box to find a road, it would be really nice if WME could leave the current zoom level well alone rather than always resetting it to level 3.

   Even if it just defaulted back to level 4 that'd be an improvement, but jumping back out to 3 means we then always have to zoom back in at least one step if we want to be able to select a street segment. And even at L4, anyone looking to do some work on point places would then need to zoom in one step more before they show up... So really, not altering the zoom level at all would be the best choice IMO.

   by Twister-UK
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=276683

   When using the WME search box to find a road, it would be really nice if WME could leave the current zoom level well alone rather than always resetting it to level 3.

   Even if it just defaulted back to level 4 that'd be an improvement, but jumping back out to 3 means we then always have to zoom back in at least one step if we want to be able to select a street segment. And even at L4, anyone looking to do some work on point places would then need to zoom in one step more before they… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

4. Parking Lots: Show Payment Types only when needed

   Please consider showing the 11 payment types checkboxes only when the "Cost" dropdown has "Low", "Moderate" or "Expensive" selected.

   This will help you to have consistent information too: For example, what does it mean that a free parking log accepts Credit Cards as a payment type?

   by bedo2991
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=275529

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Thank you for this suggestion!

   Unfortunately parking lots are low in priority, and therefore this is currently not planned.

   Thank you!
   Hezi

5. Show "Hidden" external providers like Yext

   Show that this data exists, so that editors will be more likely to merge than to delete.

   When new place points are added as part of a large upload from Yext or some other advertising aggregator, many editors will be likely to reject the new-place PURs because an already perfect place already exists.

   If they were aware that there was some other important information in the PUR, then they would be much more likely to accept the PUR.

   The back end data script reveals the existence of this data in places. But I don't think it makes sense to depend on all editors running this script all the time. The fact that this data exists should be clearly visible to all editors.

   by voludu2
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=275087

   Show that this data exists, so that editors will be more likely to merge than to delete.

   When new place points are added as part of a large upload from Yext or some other advertising aggregator, many editors will be likely to reject the new-place PURs because an already perfect place already exists.

   If they were aware that there was some other important information in the PUR, then they would be much more likely to accept the PUR.

   The back end data script reveals the existence of this data in places. But I don't think it makes sense to depend… more

   •  

   13 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you very much for this great suggestion.

   It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it when we will next use external providers.

   Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

   Best,
   Hezi

6. Prefill city when using a street name suggestion

   When we currently enter the name of a street, we get autocompletion suggestions based on existing roads in the neighbourhood. It would help quite a bit if the associated city field would also be filled in whenever we use one of these suggested road names. I know that every street has a city set (or none, on purpose) in the underlying data model, so this shouldn't be a big effort to add.

   (see Mock up 1 + 2 attached )

   I'm still contemplating whether I'll write a userscript for this or not. It's not so easy to hook into those functions, if I remember correctly.

   Implementation notes:
   To distinguish between nearby street names that exist in two cities (motorway names, for example, but also local roads can sometimes keep their name between cities), it would be best to also show the city name in the suggestions list. At the moment road names show up several times in the suggestions whenever they exist nearby in more than one city, which can be slightly confusing at first.

   If no city is set for the selected street, the 'none' checkbox for the city should be checked as well. It can of course still be changed afterwards, but I suspect that most of the time this would be most practical.

   This behaviour should only activate if a suggestion has not been clicked or has not been navigated to with the down arrow (or any other means of selecting a suggestion that I'm forgetting here). When just typing in a name, the city should not be set automatically.

   Notes about my mock-up
   An alternative for detailing the city name would be using a comma as separator, like it is done when you're not editing the name. Other alternatives: putting it between brackets or making the font smaller. The last one has the advantage that it takes up less space.
   For the first one I had to decrease the left and right padding of the autocompletion to 15px to prevent the dropdown to be covered by the scroll bar. This can probably be done better.
   For the second one I used these CSS properties: font-size:0.7em; padding-left:5px; font-weight:bold; text-transform:uppercase

   by Glodenox
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=250354

   When we currently enter the name of a street, we get autocompletion suggestions based on existing roads in the neighbourhood. It would help quite a bit if the associated city field would also be filled in whenever we use one of these suggested road names. I know that every street has a city set (or none, on purpose) in the underlying data model, so this shouldn't be a big effort to add.

   (see Mock up 1 + 2 attached )

   I'm still contemplating whether I'll write a userscript for this or not. It's not so easy to hook into those… more

   •  

   •  

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  1 comment  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

7. Moderation to merge Places

   It is not allowed to merge places with lock larger that your level.
   Could stay pending for moderation?

   by ErsonSergio
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=274330

   •  

   2 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you for this suggestion.

   As the lock level system was designed to keep the safety of the map, and this seems like an edge case, we currently not moving forward with this suggestion.

   Best,
   Hezi

8. Improvements in segment selection for road closures

   Sometimes it's necessary to select multiple segments to perform a road closure either for MTE or for a conventional closure. After you have several segments selected, you accidentally select a node and all work is lost (the section disappears). I suggest making a modification that prevents the disappearance of the selection of these segments and notifies the editor that you selected a node and it will not be possible to make the respective closure (before or at the moment of trying to save). Obviously the idea is to give you the opportunity to remove the node from the selection and continue with the work.

   by kahlcolimon
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=288148

   Sometimes it's necessary to select multiple segments to perform a road closure either for MTE or for a conventional closure. After you have several segments selected, you accidentally select a node and all work is lost (the section disappears). I suggest making a modification that prevents the disappearance of the selection of these segments and notifies the editor that you selected a node and it will not be possible to make the respective closure (before or at the moment of trying to save). Obviously the idea is to give you the opportunity to remove the node from the selection and… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you very much for this great suggestion.
   It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it.

   Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

   Best,
   Hezi

9. Setting "Repeat every year" on an existing restriction

   Now that we have the "Repeat every year" checkbox for restrictions, it'd be useful if we could tick this for existing restrictions to turn them into repeating ones, without the need to then also edit the start/end dates to avoid the "Start date can not be in the past" error.

   e.g. a segment has an existing restriction set for 5th September 2019 to 20th October 2019, and the restriction is one that ought to be set as recurring.

   The preferred workflow would be for the editor to simply tick the "Repeat every year" checkbox and save, without any other changes being required to the existing restriction setup.

   The current workflow is that the editor ticks the checkbox but then still also needs to change the start and end dates to 5th September 2020-20th October 2020, which risks introducing an error in the modified start/end dates.

   by Twister-UK
   Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=300152

   Now that we have the "Repeat every year" checkbox for restrictions, it'd be useful if we could tick this for existing restrictions to turn them into repeating ones, without the need to then also edit the start/end dates to avoid the "Start date can not be in the past" error.

   e.g. a segment has an existing restriction set for 5th September 2019 to 20th October 2019, and the restriction is one that ought to be set as recurring.

   The preferred workflow would be for the editor to simply tick the "Repeat every year" checkbox and save, without any other changes… more

   16 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Need more details  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you for this suggestion.
   We want to kindly ask you to share with us cases in which you believe this development can be at your assistance.

   This will help us to get a decision about this suggestion.

   Best,
   Hezi

10. Restricted areas: L5 users can restrict Rank 6 segments

    With restricted areas, a level 5 (or Level X user depending on what the final level will be when released in production/country setting) could currently add a restriction to a level 6 segment.

    Steps: find a rank 6 segment, draw an area on it => The segment is restricted.

    This may be a WAD (similar to closures for people who have closure permissions), but it's still risky and lowers the protection of the rank system. If the user deletes the area restriction right after the map update, the problem cannot be identified without staff intervention.

    Permalink: https://beta.waze.com/editor/?env=row&l ... =244207735

    by: by bedo2991
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=300254

    With restricted areas, a level 5 (or Level X user depending on what the final level will be when released in production/country setting) could currently add a restriction to a level 6 segment.

    Steps: find a rank 6 segment, draw an area on it => The segment is restricted.

    This may be a WAD (similar to closures for people who have closure permissions), but it's still risky and lowers the protection of the rank system. If the user deletes the area restriction right after the map update, the problem cannot be identified without staff intervention.

    Permalink: https://beta.waze.com/editor/?env=row&l ... =244207735

    by:… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

11. Invalid Railroad Regression Error

    I would put this in Beta Bugs but I know that technically it is not a bug. So I am going to make it a suggestion instead.

    If you have a railroad segment cross a street segment and you decide to junction them.
    (pic 1)
    You get an error when you save telling you that all turns are disallowed.
    (pic 2)

    While technically this is true, you CAN"T allow the turns onto/off the railroad segment (and you shouldn't be allowed to).

    This is a left over error from back when turns could be set on railroad segments and needs to be removed. It causes extra unneeded steps when adding the junction.

    I would put this in Beta Bugs but I know that technically it is not a bug. So I am going to make it a suggestion instead.

    If you have a railroad segment cross a street segment and you decide to junction them.
    (pic 1)
    You get an error when you save telling you that all turns are disallowed.
    (pic 2)

    While technically this is true, you CAN"T allow the turns onto/off the railroad segment (and you shouldn't be allowed to).

    This is a left over error from back when turns could be set on railroad segments and needs to… more

    •  

    •  

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Not a suggestion  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Hey!

    This seems to be a bug.
    A bug was opened to the relevant teams in the HQ.

    Thanks,
    Hezi

12. Clean restrictions type

    Hi

    Now that restrictions are limited to actual supported vehicules, can data be cleaned in those actives?

    Truck, coach... are visible but can't be deleted.

    Hope I'm clear enough :D

    Thanks

    by JohnDoe75
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=300443

    •  

    •  

    •  

    2 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Thank you for this suggestion, but we won’t move forward. with it.

    We left these in order to avoid deleting data that the editors worked on. This way, if we will support these in the future, the data will still be there.
    The data, as said, is not interfering with the app.

    Thanks,
    Hezi

13. Improvement for lanes

    I am attaching a suggestion here to allow adding lanes in node that refer to a "far turn". Implementing this suggestion will solve all the problems of setting lanes (including extreme complicated junctions, H and # junctions) without the need for any heuristics! It will work at any junctions even if it is extremely complex with many auxiliary segments.

    In the WME:
    When defining lanes to a segment, turns are automatically displayed for the end of the segment with the segment names to which they refer.
    My suggestion is to add an option for adding to lanes a "far turns". When you want to add a lanes for a "far turns", you will get an option to select the "far turn" and it will be added to the turns list for the lanes setting. You can define one or more "far turns".
    The idea will look like this (attachment 1)
    In the app:
    The lanes will display as defined in the WME for that node (the number of lanes and the arrows).
    When there are lanes at the node with "far turn", the arrows will be highlighted if the route passes in the "far turn".

    An example of this type of solution is required:
    The node:
    https://www.waze.com/editor/?env=il&lon ... ts=1172278
    The "far turn":
    https://www.waze.com/editor/?env=il&lon ... des=800851
    The lanes arrows:
    (Attachment 2)

    At this node, the arrows in the 2 left lanes (as seen in the attached photo) is for the next turn ("far turn").
    The left-most lane should only show left and the lane next to it should show straight and left. Currently, the WME does not allow lanes to be defined correctly at that node. The proposal demonstrates how the lanes should be edited for this node.

    by zeze13
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=301202

    I am attaching a suggestion here to allow adding lanes in node that refer to a "far turn". Implementing this suggestion will solve all the problems of setting lanes (including extreme complicated junctions, H and # junctions) without the need for any heuristics! It will work at any junctions even if it is extremely complex with many auxiliary segments.

    In the WME:
    When defining lanes to a segment, turns are automatically displayed for the end of the segment with the segment names to which they refer.
    My suggestion is to add an option for adding to lanes a "far turns".… more

    •  

    •  

    5 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Sunrise/sunset vs absolute times for restrictions

    Some roads have driving restrictions based on the local sunrise/sunset times, which are difficult to map even somewhat accurately as a series of consecutive restrictions with absolute start/end times.

    Being able to set a single year-round restriction using a "sunrise" or "sunset" option to set the start/end times, and leaving it up to the routing server to determine what the actual start/end times are for each restriction based on the current date and coordinates of the restricted segments, could therefore be useful.

    by Twister-UK
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=300153

    85 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    6 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Need more details  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Hey,

    We have looked at this suggestion, and in order to make some decisions about it, would like to kindly ask you to provide us with more data about it.

    Please share some examples for when and where this restrictions apply? (use cases)

    And any country you know relevant for it.

    Thanks!

15. Show house numbers on smaller zoom

    Currently the layer of house numbers only works on the the zoom levels 7-10. Please enable it starting from zoom 5.

    By: lg1992
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=301585

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Hey!

    Thank you for this suggestion.
    Based on some experiments with zoom level, we have decided to currently not move forward with the suggestion.

    Best,
    Hezi

16. Allow taking a Place picture from Streetview

    Requirements: the Streetview panel is open and the place layer is on

    Then: allow creating a box on the Streetview panel. When a box is drawn add a bar saying: now select a place to apply this picture.
    Add an X on the box to delete it. Allow the user to resize the box.
    Set a minimum size and a fixed ratio (the one used by the client) for a decent resolution.
    Drawing a new box removes the previous one if present.

    If then the user clicks on a place, ask him:

    "would you like to set this selection as a place picture"?
    Yes/Cancel

    The picture data is taken directly from Google and you'd have the direction of the shot too.

    by bedo2991
    Link to the original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=293006

    Requirements: the Streetview panel is open and the place layer is on

    Then: allow creating a box on the Streetview panel. When a box is drawn add a bar saying: now select a place to apply this picture.
    Add an X on the box to delete it. Allow the user to resize the box.
    Set a minimum size and a fixed ratio (the one used by the client) for a decent resolution.
    Drawing a new box removes the previous one if present.

    If then the user clicks on a place, ask him:

    "would you like to set this selection as… more

    0 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Edit…  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Thank you for this suggestion!

    As mention in the post, this is something that we won’t do, as these images are copy righted.

    Thanks!

17. Vehicle restricted closures

    Now: the closures are for all vehicles.

    SUG: possibility of applying a closure for a certain type of vehicle and not for others, for example: closures only for taxis.

    Idea by brooha40
    Link to the original suggestion in beta forum:
    https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=302017

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Currently not planned  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Thanks for this idea, but this is not planned for now.
    We do have thinking processes of making the restrictions closer to real time, but nothing concrete for now.

18. Additional camera types, with names and TTS defined by community

    July 2020, Waze has three camera types: speed, red light, dummy. It is clear talking to different community leaders that the requirements for specific cameras vary from country to country. Thus, we are asking for the ability to add new camera types per country, with the ability to input into text to speech (TTS), and on/off toggle alert in the app. These could be provided by form, similar to new gas station brands, etc. by a country's leadership.

    Alternatively, collect a list of camera types from the communities to create a long list, and allow countries to turn them on/off by country.

    Obviously there's a wide range of cameras, and in each jurisdiction some are more important to others. There are also new and emerging camera types, such as dual red light AND speed cameras, and even newly released mobile phone detection cameras which fine users for driving while holding their phone.

    July 2020, Waze has three camera types: speed, red light, dummy. It is clear talking to different community leaders that the requirements for specific cameras vary from country to country. Thus, we are asking for the ability to add new camera types per country, with the ability to input into text to speech (TTS), and on/off toggle alert in the app. These could be provided by form, similar to new gas station brands, etc. by a country's leadership.

    Alternatively, collect a list of camera types from the communities to create a long list, and allow countries to turn them on/off… more

    319 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Currently not planned  ·  11 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. Option to avoid streets with steep hills

    Please include option to avoid steep hills. With lockdown, driving isn’t an everyday thing so driving a manual car is getting harder and harder.

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. ניווט ומיפוי גשרים

    אהלן, אני איתי בוקעי, ולפני כחודש עלה לי רעיון שיכול בעיניי לעזור לנהגי משאיות וגררים גדולים, הרעיון הוא שכאשר אתה מתחיל את הנסיעה או מוריד את האפליקציה, ומכניס בקטגוריה של כלי רכב: משאית או כלי רכב גדול מאוד אחר, הוא גם יכניס את גובה הרכב שלו.
    וכל פעם שהרכב ייתקרב לגשר יודיעו לו באפליקציה על התקרבות לגשר, ואת הגובה של הגשר, ואם אפילו אפשר לבדוק מתחת לאיזה גשרים הוא לא יכול לעבור ובככה לחסוך הרבה בעיות נהיגה ובנוסף להעיר את המודעות של נהגים אלה לגובה רכבם, במידה ושכחו להוריד את המנוף או נוסעים עם חלק מהרכב מורם, ובכך אני מקווה למנוע תאונות דרכים והריסות של גשרים שיוכלו לעקב הרבה נתיבים במדינה

    אהלן, אני איתי בוקעי, ולפני כחודש עלה לי רעיון שיכול בעיניי לעזור לנהגי משאיות וגררים גדולים, הרעיון הוא שכאשר אתה מתחיל את הנסיעה או מוריד את האפליקציה, ומכניס בקטגוריה של כלי רכב: משאית או כלי רכב גדול מאוד אחר, הוא גם יכניס את גובה הרכב שלו.
    וכל פעם שהרכב ייתקרב לגשר יודיעו לו באפליקציה על התקרבות לגשר, ואת הגובה של הגשר, ואם אפילו אפשר לבדוק מתחת לאיזה גשרים הוא לא יכול לעבור ובככה לחסוך הרבה בעיות נהיגה ובנוסף להעיר את המודעות של נהגים אלה לגובה רכבם, במידה ושכחו להוריד את המנוף או נוסעים עם חלק מהרכב מורם, ובכך אני מקווה… more

    7 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close