Steven
My feedback
41 results found
-
7 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
17 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
5 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
162 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
4 votesSteven
shared this idea
·
-
2 votesSteven
shared this idea
·
-
601 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
This is needed both to more accurately identify where they are and to avoid false positives. People report police when they see them driving, which leads to false positives, but if there was a way to tell Waze there is a police car driving in the same or opposite direction, it could continually update it based on estimation of their location based on the speed limit and on new reports, until a certain amount of time elapses with no new reports.
Steven
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
This is needed both to more accurately identify where they are and to avoid false positives. People report police when they see them driving, which leads to false positives, but if there was a way to tell Waze there is a police car driving in the same or opposite direction, it could continually update it based on estimation of their location based on the speed limit and on new reports, until a certain amount of time elapses with no new reports.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
This is needed both to more accurately identify where they are and to avoid false positives. People report police when they see them driving, which leads to false positives, but if there was a way to tell Waze there is a police car driving in the same or opposite direction, it could continually update it based on estimation of their location based on the speed limit and on new reports, until a certain amount of time elapses with no new reports.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
This is needed both to more accurately identify where they are and to avoid false positives. People report police when they see them driving, which leads to false positives, but if there was a way to tell Waze there is a police car driving in the same or opposite direction, it could continually update it based on estimation of their location based on the speed limit and on new reports, until a certain amount of time elapses with no new reports.
-
8 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
7 votesSteven
shared this idea
·
-
4,072 votes
What we are aiming to do here is speed based alerters.
Steven
supported this idea
·
-
504 votes
Thank you for your valuable feedback. We're pleased to confirm that this suggestion is planned and we appreciate your input as we continue to enhance our product.
Steven
supported this idea
·
-
138 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
21 votesSteven
supported this idea
·
-
61 votes
Thanks for your feedback. While this was on our roadmap, our plans have since shifted. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Steven
supported this idea
·
-
64 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
There are other requests to be able to report police on the other side or in the middle, which I definitely agree needs to be added, but this request is especially important, because it allows users to be warned regardless of how it was reported. I'd rather get a few false positives than false negatives.
Steven
supported this idea
·
-
12 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Steven
supported this idea
·
-
1,842 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
This is done by giving it a thumbs down, and when enough people do this it will go away. Allowing one person to remove it would give too much power to that one person.
-
1,352 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
My idea for this is to have deer/animal crossing warnings (cautions similar to when driving through construction zone) when driving through areas with relatively high reportings of deer crossings and/or more than one has been reported within a certain time frame, ideally user-configurable.
Steven
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
My idea for this is to have deer/animal crossing warnings (cautions similar to when driving through construction zone) when driving through areas with relatively high reportings of deer crossings and/or more than one has been reported within a certain time frame, ideally user-configurable.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
My idea for this is to have deer/animal crossing warnings (cautions similar to when driving through construction zone) when driving through areas with relatively high reportings of deer crossings and/or more than one has been reported within a certain time frame, ideally user-configurable.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
My idea for this is to have deer/animal crossing warnings (cautions similar to when driving through construction zone) when driving through areas with relatively high reportings of deer crossings and/or more than one has been reported within a certain time frame, ideally user-configurable.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
My idea for this is to have deer/animal crossing warnings (cautions similar to when driving through construction zone) when driving through areas with relatively high reportings of deer crossings and/or more than one has been reported within a certain time frame, ideally user-configurable.
-
1,337 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
Maybe too complex, but when reporting a road that's snow-covered you could be required to estimate the depth of the snow, and with enough people doing this it could average the reports to determine the approximate depth, then there could be a setting where you can tell it to avoid roads with a certain amount of snow, e.g. 4+ inches.
Steven
supported this idea
·
An error occurred while saving the comment Steven
commented
There are several separate requests for a snow drift hazard. I wonder if an admin could merge them and the votes and comments?
This is needed both to more accurately identify where they are and to avoid false positives. People report police when they see them driving, which leads to false positives. This is the best suggestion for this I've seen, as it gives a good recommendation for how to actually do this. It's basically the same thing I came up with, to continually update it based on estimation of their location based on the speed limit and on new reports, until a certain amount of time elapses with no new reports. Biggest problem would be accounting for where the police are in relation to the second (and third, and so on) driver when they like the report, not to mention the initial reporting driver.
As for tips, neat idea, but I wonder if it would just add more complexity for something few people would actually use. I honestly doubt I would tip anyone, as my payment is all the things I report to warn other drivers. We all help each other, and our payment is everyone else helping us.