1128 results found

1. Metric system on new connections

   Hi,
   Can you add that the metric system is automatically set up according to the country to which we are connected?
   Because there are a lot of L1 in France who change the speed limits of entire districts / cities and put 50 mph ... instead of 50 km/h ... (a difference of 30 km/h ...)

   Take care and thanks for all :)

   By: InstantT
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=304262

   8 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

2. Allow closure overlapping

   Hi,
   very often I am notified of an event that needs closure after it started, then I go to select the many segments that must be closed.
   When I want to add a proper closure on them, there are already dozen of closure made by drivers and I have to remove all of them one by one before adding mine. That's annoying because it is slow, and sometimes new closure are made by drivers while I am removing them :

   And overlapping closure are not a real problem because when it is done by waze app it happens often so it seems it is a check added by WME that lead only to bad ergonomy.

   By: kpouer
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=279796

   Hi,
   very often I am notified of an event that needs closure after it started, then I go to select the many segments that must be closed.
   When I want to add a proper closure on them, there are already dozen of closure made by drivers and I have to remove all of them one by one before adding mine. That's annoying because it is slow, and sometimes new closure are made by drivers while I am removing them :

   And overlapping closure are not a real problem because when it is done by waze app it happens often so… more

   •  

   36 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Need more details  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you for the suggestion.

   In order to check this suggestion, we would like you to share some more examples with us.
   We aim to get the understanding of how often this is an issue.

   Best,
   Hezi.

3. A place with an expiration date

   I would like to suggest adding an expiration date to a place. When the expiration data is reached the place deletes it self from the map. This option is good for places such as events like weddings, parties, sports tournament etc..
   Today, many such places which their event date passed exist on the map and nobody remembers to delete them and the map gets loaded.
   The expiration date default would be of course - No expiration so that new places would not be deleted.
   Such an option is already implemented in Map comments.

   By: reuvenirony
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=276125

   22 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Looking into the suggestion  ·  Tam (Waze Team) responded

   Great timing! We’re currently working on adding an expiration date to a place. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.

4. Implement reCAPTCHA v3

   With the recent release of version 3 of reCAPTCHA (the thing you may get to see when you log in and the system suspects you may be a bot instead of a user), it would be a great idea to upgrade to the latest version. We've had several users who have had to fill in the CAPTCHA protection every time for some weird reason (I suspect someone in their neighbourhood is to blame), which could be alleviated with the new system. The system now gives you a score between 0 and 1 to gauge how trustworthy the request is. That also means you can alter how strict the system will be.

   The only downside of this means that you'll need to figure out what you'll do with people/bots with low scores. The reCAPTCHA v3 manual suggests requiring two-factor authentication or e-mail validation from such users, which would indeed help against wrong passwords, but probably won't protect the Waze map from scrapers (I suspect that is also part of the reason why the captcha was implemented).

   Either way, I think it would be a good idea to already add some v3 calls in the background without adjusting any behaviour, just to get an idea of what scores the system generates.

   By: Glodenox
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=270181

   With the recent release of version 3 of reCAPTCHA (the thing you may get to see when you log in and the system suspects you may be a bot instead of a user), it would be a great idea to upgrade to the latest version. We've had several users who have had to fill in the CAPTCHA protection every time for some weird reason (I suspect someone in their neighbourhood is to blame), which could be alleviated with the new system. The system now gives you a score between 0 and 1 to gauge how trustworthy the request is. That… more

   0 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Under consideration  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

5. More Specific Error Messages

   Specific error messages are very useful, and we can use more of them.

   Here are some recent cases I have run across where it would be helpful to have a more-specific error message

   RPP too far from identical HN (zoom out if necessary to highlight the HN location)
   RPP too far from recently-deleted HN; try again after HN update. (zoom out to highlight the former HN location)
   Improper restricted turn in JB (show and highlight the specific turn arrow which is the problem). Allow the turn and try again (https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=211&t=276336&p=1922955#p1922761)

   By: voludu2
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=276591

   38 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   We're working on it  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Hey!
   Thank you very much for this suggestion.

   Detailed Error messages are part of the planned idea of the WME dev team these days.

   We will keep you updated with any updates

   Best,
   Hezi

6. WME frontend should show backend errors

   Hi,
   when saving, if the backend fails, it returns a message. But often they are not localized, and in that case we get a generic
   "Please try again later" which is useless because in most case the problem will not solve and the only solution is to cancel all edits.
   Here is a list of messages that are not localized and need to be displayed (maybe not exactly in the same form, but at least do not tell the user to try again if it is impossible that it works.

   Invalid street 0 was set for venue ID -100
   Missmatch max speed in original segments
   Property toSegID of NodeConnection with ID 305118209f/-113r references Segment with no generated ID for -113
   Node 282093744 is not connected to segment 356869225

   There are probably many more, but it is the one I got while editing recently.

   Of course it would be even better if the frontend did not generate situation causing those errors :)

   By: kpouer
   Link to original suggestion:https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=257666

   Hi,
   when saving, if the backend fails, it returns a message. But often they are not localized, and in that case we get a generic
   "Please try again later" which is useless because in most case the problem will not solve and the only solution is to cancel all edits.
   Here is a list of messages that are not localized and need to be displayed (maybe not exactly in the same form, but at least do not tell the user to try again if it is impossible that it works.

   Invalid street 0 was set for venue ID -100
   Missmatch… more

   11 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you very much for this great suggestion.
   It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it.

   Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

   Best,
   Hezi

7. [Request] Allow to make streets two way temporarily

   Allow to make streets two way temporarily, like closures, but the other way around.
   Sometimes construction works require you to open another street and turns. And you cannot do this in time by editing map. You can close the streets, but you cant OPEN the streets for some time. I mean one way or with restricted turns.
   So we need an option to temporarily bypass one way setting and closed turns penalty. This may be called Openers :)

   By: Olestas
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=194260

   280 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   Currently not planned  ·  3 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

8. Show RPP PUR's on feed list

   There is no privacy issue involved here.

   There's simply a pin in the map, among many others, but I can't find them like any others, just because category is "residential"

   The privacy issues are solved by the already omitted creator/updater of the place. By not showing them, you are simply making it harder for the PUR be moderated, as we have to scan the map or rely on scripts to do that.

   So, plainly: RPP PUR's should be shown in feed list just as any other PUR.

   OBS: Previous discussion took place here: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=211&t=249211&p=1774596#p1774596

   By: biuick84
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=249492

   There is no privacy issue involved here.

   There's simply a pin in the map, among many others, but I can't find them like any others, just because category is "residential"

   The privacy issues are solved by the already omitted creator/updater of the place. By not showing them, you are simply making it harder for the PUR be moderated, as we have to scan the map or rely on scripts to do that.

   So, plainly: RPP PUR's should be shown in feed list just as any other PUR.

   OBS: Previous discussion took place here: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=211&t=249211&p=1774596#p1774596

   By: biuick84
   Link to original suggestion: … more

   3 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you very much for this great suggestion.
   It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it.

   Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

   Best,
   Hezi

9. Keep previous history for merged/split segments

   Hello!

   I think it would be very helpful if segment history included data from previous "iterations" of that segment, when a segment was created by merge or split.

   Right now, the history starts anew any time there is a new segment ID, but I would imagine it should be fairly trivial to develop a backend mechanism that, any time a segment is split or merged, merges the history of the previous segment ID into the new segment's history.

   This is useful not only diagnostically but also to catch cheaters on the map, who today can split and merge segments at will with no evidence.

   It is very easy to envision how this would work with a segment created by split, as the history of the previous, longer segment can simply be displayed before the "Segment created by split" line, perhaps with the old ID of the previous segment appended.

   For segments created by merge, obviously there are multiple histories to incorporate, but I think it can still be done in a sensible way from a UX / UI standpoint, as follows.

   Right now, the history of a merged segment starts with "Segment created by merge", and the data is lost. In a better implementation, perhaps it looks like this: "Segment created by merge of [segment ID 1] and [segment ID 2]".

   Then, at the time of the merge, the old history of the other two segments are merged into the new segment as well, with the old segment ID appended.

   So, let's say you have segments 123 and 345 from the basemap, each with a few edits before, named "Main St", connected by a node, then you delete the node to merge the segments into segment 54321 (newer segments have much higher IDs!). Right now, the history would be simply,
   Mon May 01 2017 by sketch(6) / Segment created by merge

   Let's say the other segments have history like this:
   123:
   Wed Dec 14 2016 by EladOfTheBerg(2)
   Updated Geometry
   GEOMETRY
   Changed from [this] to [this]
   Thu Jun 23 2016 by WilliamHMacy69(1)
   Updated Primary street name
   PRIMARY STREET NAME
   Changed from Maine Street to Main St

   345:
   Fri Aug 26 2016 by RickyBobby666(3)
   Updated Lock level
   LOCK LEVEL
   Changed from 1 to 3
   Thu Jun 23 2016 by WilliamHMacy69(1)
   Updated Primary street name
   PRIMARY STREET NAME
   Changed from Maine Street to Main St

   In the improved implementation, the history for segment 54321 would read:
   Mon May 01 2017 by sketch(6)
   Segment created by merge of 123 and 345
   Wed Dec 14 2016 by EladOfTheBerg(1) (ID: 123)
   Updated Geometry
   GEOMETRY
   Changed from [this] to [this]
   Fri Aug 26 2016 by RickyBobby666(3) (ID: 345)
   Updated Lock level
   LOCK LEVEL
   Changed from 1 to 3
   Thu Jun 23 2016 by WilliamHMacy69(1) (ID: 123, 345)
   Updated Primary street name
   PRIMARY STREET NAME
   Changed from Maine Street to Main St

   If you really want to get fancy, the "123" and "345" in "Segment created by merge of 123 and 345" could be little hover buttons like with the geometry changes.

   By: sketch
   Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=225928

   Hello!

   I think it would be very helpful if segment history included data from previous "iterations" of that segment, when a segment was created by merge or split.

   Right now, the history starts anew any time there is a new segment ID, but I would imagine it should be fairly trivial to develop a backend mechanism that, any time a segment is split or merged, merges the history of the previous segment ID into the new segment's history.

   This is useful not only diagnostically but also to catch cheaters on the map, who today can split and merge segments at… more

   116 votes

   Vote Vote Vote

   Vote

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close

   1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

   You have left! (?) (thinking…)
   0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
   How important is this to you?

   Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

   We're glad you're here

   Please sign in to leave feedback

   Signed in as (Sign out)

   Close

   Close
   Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

   Hey!

   Thank you very much for this great suggestion.
   It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it.

   Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

   Best,
   Hezi

10. [Segment Attribute Request] Treat 2 Way as Divided

    I would like to have the ability to draw a single 2-way segment but be able to mark it as divided so it does not say you have arrived until on correct side of road. Sometimes you may have a segment that may not really need to be divided into 2 One-Way segments but if you want routing to offer the correct directions you would have to divide the segments. In my picture below, the red line shows what Waze currently does (it says you have arrived as you pass the house) The green line shows what it should be doing. This can be accomplished by dividing but if there was an attribute that says "divided segment" that Waze would treat the 2-way segment as 2 One-Way segments, then we would not have to add extra "unneeded" segments but still give the correct routing.

    I really think this would go a long way in helping when we have just a short segment that is divided along a longer undivided segment.

    By: jm6087
    Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=223766

    I would like to have the ability to draw a single 2-way segment but be able to mark it as divided so it does not say you have arrived until on correct side of road. Sometimes you may have a segment that may not really need to be divided into 2 One-Way segments but if you want routing to offer the correct directions you would have to divide the segments. In my picture below, the red line shows what Waze currently does (it says you have arrived as you pass the house) The green line shows what it should be… more

    •  

    100 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Hey,

    This topic may not answered as part of the suggestion up until now, but it has been discussed multiple times across the relevant teams.

    We will keep on updating with any news

    Best,
    Hezi

11. Push questions to communicate with drivers

    A suggestion to enable Push questions (PQ’s) to communicate with drivers in order to solve map problems
    I thought it would be really great if Area managers would be able to send PQ’s to drivers in order to get their help in resolving map problems.
    For example:
    • If I get a UR (in an area with low traffic) suggesting that a right turn isn’t enabled anymore and I want to verify this I might need to wait a long time until someone else will send an additional UR.
    • Or if a road is suspected to be closed and I want to verify it before issuing an RT closure.
    In such cases I would issue a PQ in WME.

    This PQ would be sent to drivers (who marked in the application that they are willing to get such PQ’s):
    • In the area
    • In a route crossing the location
    • In a route not crossing the location but suggesting them a small re-route to check the issue.
    There are many variants on how to realize this suggestion. For example it could be realized by enabling a pre-defined set of questions in WME were you only need to update street names.
    Also in order not to disturb drivers too much they can set in the application how many such PQ’s they are willing to get in one day / route.

    Is this idea something that Waze devs are thinking about?
    Is it on the list of future developments?
    Thanks,

    By: reuvenirony
    Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=220636

    A suggestion to enable Push questions (PQ’s) to communicate with drivers in order to solve map problems
    I thought it would be really great if Area managers would be able to send PQ’s to drivers in order to get their help in resolving map problems.
    For example:
    • If I get a UR (in an area with low traffic) suggesting that a right turn isn’t enabled anymore and I want to verify this I might need to wait a long time until someone else will send an additional UR.
    • Or if a road is suspected to be closed and… more

    8 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Under consideration  ·  2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

12. [Request] Map Comments Expiration Notification

    When a Map Comment (MC) has been entered and is nearing its expiration (2 weeks in advance or 1 week in advance), notify and/or place a note in the Feed of the expiring MC.

    This would allow the editor to verify if the MC is still needed, extend it, and/or reconnect road segments where a long-term project may have warranted segment disconnects instead of long-term RTCs.

    If roads were disconnected and the project is nearing completion, this would allow the editor to reconnect the segments and then add RTCs so routing could occur immediately upon the completion of the project instead of waiting on a tile update.

    By: karlcr9911
    Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=214139

    When a Map Comment (MC) has been entered and is nearing its expiration (2 weeks in advance or 1 week in advance), notify and/or place a note in the Feed of the expiring MC.

    This would allow the editor to verify if the MC is still needed, extend it, and/or reconnect road segments where a long-term project may have warranted segment disconnects instead of long-term RTCs.

    If roads were disconnected and the project is nearing completion, this would allow the editor to reconnect the segments and then add RTCs so routing could occur immediately upon the completion of the project… more

    45 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close
    Added to backlog  ·  AdminWaze Team (Admin) (Admin, Waze) responded

    Hey!

    Thank you very much for this great suggestion.
    It was added to our backlog to try and see the possibility to implement it.

    Please note there is no ETA for it yet.

    Best,
    Hezi

13. [REQUEST] Feed Filters

    It would be very nice if we could filter the feed by notification types (more or less like URO+ does, but without having to reload the feed several times to find the ones you selected).

    Options suggested:

    Notifications (checkboxes):
    - PURs (and subtypes);
    - URs (and subtypes);
    - PMs.

    Areas:
    - State XX (particularly useful for SMs and CMs);
    - Areas driven [last XX days];
    - Country (useful for CMs);
    - All editable areas.

    Those above are what I miss the most. But, since we're at it, some extra suggestions would be:

    Listing reason:
    - Reported by you;
    - New comments on an issue you follow;
    - An issue you follow;
    - Around a favorite place.

    Sort by:
    - Time open (asc/desc);
    - Number of comments (for URs) (asc/desc);
    - Distance (of current shown position).

    Some other thoughts about this suggestion are welcome! ;)

    By: GuibaBR
    Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=198461

    It would be very nice if we could filter the feed by notification types (more or less like URO+ does, but without having to reload the feed several times to find the ones you selected).

    Options suggested:

    Notifications (checkboxes):
    - PURs (and subtypes);
    - URs (and subtypes);
    - PMs.

    Areas:
    - State XX (particularly useful for SMs and CMs);
    - Areas driven [last XX days];
    - Country (useful for CMs);
    - All editable areas.

    Those above are what I miss the most. But, since we're at it, some extra suggestions would be:

    Listing reason:
    - Reported by you;
    - New… more

    9 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    We're working on it  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

14. Split Place

    After the succes of the Merge Places feature I would like to add a request to Split Places.

    There are instances where wazers add a photo to a place that is not related to that place, but something nearby. At this moment we don't have a choice but to reject the photo. I would like an opportunity to use it to create a new place.

    By: GerardterBeke
    Link to original suggestion: https://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=1525&t=293181

    22 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Looking into the suggestion  ·  0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

15. Hola, falta los avisos de solo camiones

    No avisa por donde pueden pasar los camiones y por donde no

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

16. Incluir combustibles del vehículo y mostrar en ruta las gasolineras del combustible seleccionado.

    Creo muy conveniente poder elegir el combustible de tu vehículo y que mostrará las gasolineras en la ruta seleccionada, con un rango de "x" km para poder marcar la gasolinera y automáticamente recalcular la rupa para llevarte a repostar y seguir la ruta. En mi caso uso GLP (principalmente) y Gasolina.

    6 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

17. Masuk kan icon banjir didlm hazard

    Icon banjir part of hazard. Wazer can post it when the road is congested due to banjir kilat

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

18. You should have a rain and snow option under the weather option of reporting to other wazers

    Rain and snow option under the weather category

    4 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

19. how to resize speedometer on waze

    How do I make the speedometer large, it's very hard to see.

    3 votes

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    1 comment  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

20. Opção de correção de trajeto em tempo real

    O app deveria ter uma opção de correção de trajeto . Pois tem rotas que o app me manda dar a volta no quarteirão ao invés de só seguir reto como se o restante da via fosse contra mão. Isso me atrapalha muito, pois sou motorista de aplicativos.

    1 vote

    Vote Vote Vote

    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close

    1 vote 2 votes 3 votes Remove votes

    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    0 comments  ·  Delete…  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?

    Not at all You must login first! Important You must login first! Critical You must login first!

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)

    Close

    Close