Anonymous
My feedback
39 results found
-
92 votes
We plan to work on updating UR editor reply email in the near future.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
33 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
33 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
12 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
69 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment Anonymous supported this idea · -
960 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
139 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
26 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
9 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
101 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
85 votes
Thanks for your feedback. At this time, this doesn't fit on our roadmap, but we'll keep it in mind for future product planning.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
31 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
60 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on the option to invert the filter. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
105 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
48 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
42 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
-
51 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on the option to disable automatic refresh. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
50 votes
Great timing! We’re currently working on adding a disc parking option. Keep an eye out for updates on the WME.
Anonymous supported this idea · -
269 votes
Hey,
Please note we're changing the status of this suggestion to Not right now, since we finalized our plans for 2024 and this idea won't be implemented this year.
We hope to include it in our plans for later down the line.
Thanks!
Anonymous supported this idea · -
329 votesAnonymous supported this idea ·
I would like to bring this topic back up.
In the following we have 3 examples where the layer from a city a is over one from another city (mostly or complete)
Example 1:
"Siebengewald" (Netherland) is covered by german city "Goch"
https://ibb.co/ZHmMtVc // Permalink: https://waze.com/de/editor?env=row&lat=51.65641&lon=6.13457&zoomLevel=14
Example 2:
City "Markkleeberg" is mostly covered by city of "Leipzig"
https://ibb.co/dBNpVvP // Permalink: https://waze.com/de/editor?env=row&lat=51.30688&lon=12.43872&zoomLevel=12
Example 3:
City "Oberheldrungen" is complety covered by city "An der Schmücke"
https://ibb.co/cTy2Yf8 // Permalink: https://waze.com/de/editor?env=row&lat=51.29013&lon=11.26961&marker=true&zoomLevel=13
In all cases the segments have the correct citys there, the form of the citys is not correctly builded up by the waze city layers.
So an improvement is necessary.